On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Jack O'Quin wrote: > There seems to be a lot of useful information in the debbuild pages, > but I have not been able to locate any details about what the various > fields mean: > >  http://www.ros.org/debbuild/diamondback.html > > Specifically, what does the presence or absence of a version number > mean? When there is a depends missing, how to I find out what it is? > Does missing deb mean the build failed for that platform? The status page was sort of an incremental improvement on a hacky script, so the information it has is more a matter of what was convenient to grab than what would be nice to have. Here is a summary of the state of affairs: There are 3 repositories. 'ros-shadow', 'ros-shadow-fixed', and 'ros'. All building happens against the 'ros-shadow' repository. When a complete build (referred to in the build system as a build of 'ALL') succeeds, a copy is automatically made from ros-shadow to ros-shadow-fixed. Finally, when we want to release debs to the public, we copy from ros-shadow-fixed to ros. Whenever a build for a particular stack is triggered, builds are first run for all the upstream stacks that that stack depends upon. For each stack that builds successfully, first all downstream debs (stacks which depend on the built stack) are removed from the ros-shadow repository, and then the newly built deb is added into the shadow repo. A "missing deb", i.e. something in bright red, only means it is not currently in the shadow repo. The definition of missing is version-specific, so once you release your stack and it no longer matches what's in the repo, it will become red until it gets built. However, since debs are removed from the repo after an upstream build completes, it is possible that a deb becomes missing because something it depended on got rebuilt. In theory, anything in red should be able to be built. By comparison, something in pink (depends missing) actually can't be built because it depends on something which is missing. Finally, the version numbers in the table refer to the respective versions in the ros-shadow-fixed and ros repositories respectively. If no numbers are present it means the same version of the stack (the version listed in the left-most column) is in all 3 repositories. If you're waiting for a particular version of a stack to make it through the pipeline, the key thing you care about is when the number shows up in the ros-shadow-fixed entry, since that means it's part of a full set of debs that can be pushed to the ros repository trivially. There is not a good way of knowing which specific dependency is missing, and in truth it's not a particularly useful piece of information since you don't know WHY said deb might be missing. There is no way at the moment to distinguish between a broken and an unbuilt deb. That is information which needs to get pulled out of hudson or out of the failure emails that get sent. Hope that helps, --Jeremy