hi dejan, i think videre_stereo_cam using the dcam1394 library written by willowgarage and moved to cameradc1394. as for the differences, it looks like the new camera1394 package by Jack is much more consistent with the rest of the camera packages, so i would recommend using it rosen, 2010/4/13 Dejan Pangercic : > Hi Rosen, > > I am trying to get my Videre up and running and thus reproducing your problem. > Which package are u using to get the initial data stream from the camera: > cameradc1394 from cmu repo > or > camera1394 from ros-pkg-trunk/stacks/camera_drivers_experimental? > > If the former, in how is it different from the latter? > > cheers, D. > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Rosen Diankov wrote: >> hi guys, >> >> currently i'm using the videre_stereo_cam package by Antons to get >> stereo data. This publishes the image_raw and camera_info messages as >> expected, which is then fed into stereo_image_proc. >> >> stereo_image_proc itself publishes image_rect, image_color, >> image_mono, which I'm guessing undistort the raw images. However, a >> new camera_info isn't published that has CameraInfo.D set to all >> zeros. This confuses other nodes taking in the processed images and >> the camera_info, so is it possible to publish a new camera_info >> message to use for the output images? >> >> rosen, >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> > > > > -- > MSc. Dejan Pangercic > PhD Student/Researcher > Computer Science IX > Technische Universität München > Telephone: +49 (89) 289-17780 > E-Mail: dejan.pangercic@in.tum.de > WWW: http://ias.cs.tum.edu/people/pangercic > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >