hi Pablo, Anton, I wrote the erratic_player package back when we were working with Erratics. While we still have some around, we don't use them often, and definitely aren't maintaining the erratic_player package. It sounds like your package should become the new official way to use an Erratic with ROS. You might even just claim the name 'videre_erratic' for your package, to help people find it. brian. On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Antons Rebguns wrote: > Pablo, >> >> Hi ROS users. >> >> I was wondering what's the difference between those packages. Both of them >> have a wiki page but are empty. > > These packages are basically the same, ua_erratic_player is slightly > modified to work with our own model of erratic mobile base (can be found in > erratic_description package). We are publishing a single transform from > "odom" frame to "base_footprint" frame, instead of 3 transforms that > erratic_player publishes > ("odom"->"base_link_offset"->"base_link"->"base_laser_link"). I've also > modified the code so that you can specify topics for odometry and battery > information in launch files, but these can be removed since we can just use > ROS remapping mechanism. Other than that they are the same. > So if you'd like to use our model, I'd suggest also using our modified > player driver. > >> >> - erratic_player has a little documented code API but I couldn't find the >> package folder in the svn repository. Where is it? > > Here is the link to erratic_player source: > https://code.ros.org/trac/wg-ros-pkg/browser/trunk/stacks/erratic_robot/erratic_player > >> >> - On the other hand the ua_erratic_player package is a more visible >> package through google.code but has an undocumented code page. >> >> Anyways I've added some documentation documentation to ua_erratic_player >> (because I could see the source code). Are there any problem with this? :-) >> Thanks for the ROS project, it's absolutely wonderful. Congratulations! >> >> Refs: >> http://www.ros.org/wiki/erratic_player >> http://www.ros.org/wiki/ua_erratic_player >> > > Thank you very much for adding documentation! There's absolutely no problem > with people contributing docs :) > > Anton > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > >