Sorry, that message should have been addressed to Dan, not Tucker. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:30 AM, David Feil-Seifer wrote: > Tucker- > > This looks about right. I don't know what the problem is, but here is > a summary of what I think so far: > > The reason that the pulse is used is that the p2os microcontroller has > a watchdog timer. Every 2 seconds (or more or less, I think this > parameter is settable), if the pioneer has not received any messages > from the connected computer (in this case the ROS p2os node) it will > disable the motors. If this would happen, the motors light (on the top > on pioneer 2s, pre h8 controller; on the right side on pioneer2 h8 and > later) would start flashing slowly instead of flashing quickly or > lighting up solid. However, when the robot was re-enabled, it should > not make any noise. > > However, there is a chance that you have some user-defined beeps > enabled on the microcontroller. If you could do one of two things, I > could get a better picture of where your particular problem behavior > was originating: > > 1.) (less invasive, but more time-consuming) Install player > (playerstage.sourceforge.net; latest version 2, version 3 does not > seem to be working properly with the pioneer). Set it up to connect to > a pioneer. Tell me if the same behavior occurs with player. This node > was based heavily on the player driver for the pioneer, so if I made > some error making the ROS conversion, this should pick that up. > > 2.) (more invasive, try this only if number 1 does not work) Reset > your pioneer's microcontroller to factory settings. Now, I don't know > how to do this, but if you have some user-enabled setting that is > causing this odd behavior, this should eliminate it, as the robots > that I'm working one here are factory-default. > > Thanks, and I hope that we can get this sorted out as soon as possible. > > -Dave > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Dan Lazewatsky > wrote: >> Tucker, >> I'm at rev 54. Changing pulse from 1.0 to 0.5 didn't have any effect other >> than playing the startup sound more often. My launch file is attached. >> >> -Dan >> On May 18, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Tucker Hermans wrote: >> >> Dan, >> Are you using the latest version (rev 52 or newer)?  David updated some >> things to make the timing switch to using ros time instead of the standard >> system time.  After this change I had to change to explicitly sending >> pulses, whereas I did not before.  Now setting pulse to 0.5 works and I have >> no issue with the use_sonar  parameter responding correctly. >> If this doesn't work, then can you attach your launch file? >> -Tucker >> >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Dan Lazewatsky >> wrote: >>> >>> I finally had a chance to play around with this some more. Setting pulse >>> to 1.0 does indeed make the motors respond sensibly, but also seems to cause >>> the robot to constantly make the startup beeps and turn on the sonar >>> regardless of what use_sonar is set to. >>> -Dan >>> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Tucker Hermans wrote: >>> >>> Dan, >>> There is a pulse parameter on the ros parameter server for the p2os node >>> (see p2osnode.cc line 49 for where it is defined). >>> If you set this value to something other than -1.0 it should send the >>> pulse (see p2osnode.cc line 725). >>> Adding the following line to the p2os node in your launch file should do >>> the trick: >>> >>> -Tucker >>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Dan Lazewatsky >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> No luck setting pulse to 1 (I'm assuming you're referring to the PULSE >>>> parameter in robot_params.h) >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> On 4/23/10 2:39 PM, David Feil-Seifer wrote: >>>> > I wrote the node, but a while ago, so I can't be sure, but Ithink that >>>> > I sent a "pulse" message every 1s to keep that watchdog from kicking >>>> > in. However, by default it is turned off. Try setting the "pulse" >>>> > parameter to 1. >>>> > >>>> > -Dave >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Brian Gerkey >>>> >  wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> It's been a long time since I used a Pioneer, and I haven't looked at >>>> >> the node that you're using, so this is shooting in the dark: >>>> >> >>>> >> If I recall correctly, the microcontroller implements a watchdog that >>>> >> will stop the motors if it hasn't heard a velocity command over the >>>> >> serial line after a certain amount of time.  If you send commands too >>>> >> slowly, the watchdog would kick in between commands, causing the robot >>>> >> to move a bit, halt, move a bit, halt, etc. I believe that the >>>> >> watchdog is configurable, or at least can be turned on or off, which >>>> >> might account for the different in behavior between your robots. >>>> >> >>>> >> Something to try is to make the node resend the last received velocity >>>> >> to the robot at a relatively high rate (10Hz should be enough).  Of >>>> >> course, the node should then implement its own watchdog, which would >>>> >> send zero velocities if it hasn't received a command via ROS after >>>> >> some time. >>>> >> >>>> >>         brian. >>>> >> >>>> >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Tucker >>>> >> Hermans  wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Dan, >>>> >>> Without being able to investigate your setup further, the only thing >>>> >>> I can >>>> >>> think is that the commands being sent over the serial connection are >>>> >>> either >>>> >>> experiencing high latency or are being sent to infrequently, so that >>>> >>> the >>>> >>> velocity commands sent to the microcontroller are far enough apart >>>> >>> that you >>>> >>> get the stuttering effect. >>>> >>> I tried reproducing this by setting a very high time (30s as opposed >>>> >>> to 2s) >>>> >>> to resend velocity commands but this had no effect.  Are you seeing >>>> >>> statements from the p2os node of the form "new speed [0.25, 0.0] >>>> >>> (timestamp)" and "setting vel: [0.25,0.0]".  If not what kind of >>>> >>> debug >>>> >>> output are you seeing on the node? >>>> >>> -Tucker >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Dan >>>> >>> Lazewatsky >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> I just tried out a few things from your pioneer_control package and >>>> >>>> I get >>>> >>>> the same behavior I was seeing before. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/21/10 7:13 PM, Dan Lazewatsky wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Tucker, >>>> >>>> I think that should be enough to get me going. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -Dan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/21/10 6:57 PM, Tucker Hermans wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Dan, >>>> >>>> I send the MotorState command of 4 and have no problems. >>>> >>>> I have a teleop keyboard port which I use for communicating with the >>>> >>>> p3dx >>>> >>>> that you can find >>>> >>>> here: github.com/trhermans/AffLearning/tree/master/pioneer_control/ >>>> >>>> Note: the launch file is setup for a p3dx with a PTZ connected to an >>>> >>>> onboard computer and uses the probe camera driver to get the video >>>> >>>> stream. >>>> >>>> I have only been testing the changes to the p2os package on a p3dx >>>> >>>> with an >>>> >>>> onboard computer, I don't think this should have any issues, but it >>>> >>>> could. >>>> >>>> Let me know if the keyboard operation gives the same problems you >>>> >>>> have now >>>> >>>> and I'll try and help debug it. >>>> >>>> -Tucker >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Dan Lazewatsky >>>> >>>>  wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi all - >>>> >>>>> I know this has been discussed here a bit, but not in much detail. >>>> >>>>> We have a Pioneer3dx that we'd like to get up and running again. I >>>> >>>>> downloaded and compiled the p2os package which seems to be able to >>>> >>>>> successfully connect and communicate with the robot using a serial >>>> >>>>> to >>>> >>>>> USB adapter. However, I'm having trouble getting the motors to do >>>> >>>>> anything sensible. The robot's motor self-test looks like it works >>>> >>>>> fine, >>>> >>>>> but sending cmd_vel, all I can get is extremely slow, jerky >>>> >>>>> movement >>>> >>>>> forward or backwards (no turning). I enabled the motors with: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> rostopic pub cmd_motor_state -1 p2os/MotorState 1 (I also tried 4 >>>> >>>>> instead of 1 which was mentioned in a previous discussion) >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> This feels like a communication problem between the motor commands >>>> >>>>> p2os >>>> >>>>> is sending and the robot, but I don't know what's going on. Any >>>> >>>>> ideas? >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> -Dan >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> >>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> >>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>> ros-users mailing list >>>> >>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> ros-users mailing list >>>> >> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > ros-users mailing list >>>> > ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ros-users mailing list >>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ros-users mailing list >>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> >> >