The camera1394 API review is scheduled for tomorrow. I have not yet
received feedback from any reviewers for this package.

Should we postpone the review meeting for a day, so people have more
time to study the material?

(We just finished thorough API and doc reviews of camera_info_manager.
Maybe everyone else is as exhausted from that as I am. Many thanks to
all who participated.)

Camera1394 really needs a good, thoughtful review with participants
who know 1394 cameras and others who know the ROS camera interfaces.
If you want to participate, please let me know or add your name to the
Review wiki page:

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@gmail.com> wrote:
> This package is a candidate for inclusion in the next ROS release, C-Turtle.
>
> Camera1394 is a ROS port of the Player camera1394 driver for devices
> supporting the IEEE 1394 Digital Camera protocol. It is designed to
> work with the ROS image_pipeline with minimal dependencies, using
> libdc1394 for device access.
>
> As I am in Texas, not California, this review will be handled on-line
> via IRC using #meeting.ros.org at freenode.net on Wednesday, May 27th
> at 3:00PM Central Time (1:00PM Pacific Time). We need reviewers who
> will commit to reading the documentation and providing feedback before
> the on-line review meeting.
>
> Users of 1394 digital cameras and developers of ROS camera drivers are
> especially encouraged to participate. Please respond to this message
> (on or off list) if you are willing to be a reviewer. I need to hear
> from you to know whether we will have adequate coverage.
>
> The review page is here, with pointers to the documentation:
>
>  http://www.ros.org/wiki/camera1394/Reviews/2010-05-27_API_Review
>
> Please update the review page "Concerns and Issues" in preparation for
> the review session.
-- 
 joq