On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Daniel Stonier wrote: > > Greetings all, > > This is targeted at anyone who is either working with a fully cross-compiled > ros or simply using it as a convenient build environment to do embedded > programming with toolchains. > It seems that we're now having a few groups actively working at various > stages cross-compiling with the RoS and rather than going it solo all the > time, it would be good if we could pool resources. As I've mentioned before > on the mailing list, I've been working at building an environment for > cross-compiling that automates and simplifies the process and have tested it > on the guinea pigs (err lads) at work who have little and often no > experience with cross compiling. They seem to be taking to it well, so I'd > like to go a step further and see if we can help the RoS scale down as well > as its been scaling up. > What I'd like to propose as goals for the project. > > Simplify the cross compiling environment for the ros with tools, packages, > documentation and contact points. > Be responsible for testing, maintaining and providing patches upstream to > ros that enable embedded ros'. > Be a collective group that is willing to work together/share problems common > to cross-compiling and more particularly cross-compiling in general. > Provide guides/tools that enable building of simple root filesystems running > the ros. > Provide guides/tools for development on common targets (including > emulations). > Endeavour to keep a watch (and provide fixes) on ros/ros stacks so that as > much as possible correctly cross compiles. > > What I envisage us needing at least to get kick started: > >  An official ros package repository with tools and build scripts dedicated > to cross-compiling accompanied by good documentation for the ros websites > > A library of cmake modules representing different toolchains* > A library of cmake modules representing different platforms* > Python scripts of many sorts...* > Packages which provide cmake build scripts for ros dependencies, e.g. boost, > apr, apr-log* > Cross compiling test packages such as msg_latency, rpc_latency* > Maintains patches for the ros which automatically apply on selection of a > toolchain (until the patches get merged upstream)* > Tools for building simple embedded ros root filesystems (or instructions). > > A dev area (e.g. redmine with issue tracker, wiki and forum) where cross > compiling issues can be tracked and discussed. > An irc room for live interaction. > > Some of these tools* we're already using at Yujin and are bundled in the ecl > (link below). However I think its both simpler and better if I unbundle them > and commit them to a project with a single focus. To give some idea of their > usage currently in the ecl and at Yujin: > > Partial cross guide : > http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/wiki/ecl/Partial_cross_compile > Full cross guide : > http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/wiki/ecl/Full_cross_compile > Build tools : > http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/wiki/ecl/Ecl_ros_python_tools > CMake toolchains/platforms : > http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/embedded/ecl/ecl_build/html/index.html > Ros deps : http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/wiki/ecl/Ecl_cross > Embedded opencv (no gui and utilises rosconfig.cmake) : > http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/redmine/embedded/ecl/ecl_opencv/html/index.html > > To kick start I'm thinking of opening a google code project to simplify and > transfer the ecl build components and a redmine project at snorriheim for a > dev area. My schedule is a bit tight until september when I'll have about > two weeks free time to really work on it, but I'd like to canvas here first > for some opinions or advice and see if there are other interested parties > that would like to participate or also provide some input. > > Any thoughts/suggestions? Sounds like a good idea to me. --  joq