Hi Radu, I'm still using cturtle, not latest. Once we finish our book grabbing demo this week, I'll update to latest and give it a shot =) Thanks for fixing it so quickly. By the way, opencv seems to have a similar problem of using degrees instead of radians (e.g. in cv::getRotationMatrix2D). Do you know if there are plans to adopt the same SI units convention in opencv anytime soon? -Jared Quoting Radu Bogdan Rusu : > Hi Jared, > > I pushed 0.2.4 out. Can you please let me know if that fixed the problem? > > Thanks, > Radu. > > On 08/10/2010 08:01 PM, Jared Marshall Glover wrote: >> Hi Radu, >> >> Yes, after a quick grep for "180" in pcl/src, it looks like the problem >> is just >> in sac_segmentation.hpp, lines 153, 170, 294, and 318. But you'll also >> need to >> change any code (including on the wiki tutorials) that uses those models >> for >> segmentation. >> >> -Jared >> >> >> >> Quoting Radu Bogdan Rusu : >> >>> Hi Jared, >>> >>> Is this just in sac_segmentation.hpp (153, 170), or did you find it >>> anywhere else? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Radu. >>> >>> On 08/10/2010 02:17 PM, Jared Marshall Glover wrote: >>>> Hi Radu, >>>> >>>> Ok I created a ticket. But it may be a larger issue than just >>>> consistency in >>>> SACSegmentation::setEpsAngle(). Also, you don't necessarily want to >>>> break >>>> existing code without warning. Maybe you should decide on a unit >>>> system and >>>> put a clear indication in the documentation that as of version XXX all >>>> units >>>> will be standardized? >>>> >>>> -Jared >>>> >>>> >>>> Quoting Radu Bogdan Rusu : >>>> >>>>> Hi Jared, >>>>> >>>>> oops. Can you please send me a patch (ticket works too)? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Radu. >>>>> >>>>> On 08/10/2010 02:05 PM, Jared Marshall Glover wrote: >>>>>> There seems to be an inconsistency in PCL (at least in cturtle...I >>>>>> haven't >>>>>> checked latest), in that some methods take angles in radians and >>>>>> some in >>>>>> degrees. For example, SACSegmentation::setEpsAngle() accepts >>>>>> degrees for >>>>>> SACMODEL_ORIENTED_PLANE, but radians for SACMODEL_ORIENTED_LINE. >>>>>> Perhaps there >>>>>> should be a single convention throughout PCL to avoid confusion? It's >>>>>> already >>>>>> caused some headaches around here =) >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jared >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> | Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> | Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/ >>> >> >> > > -- > | Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/ >