Jared,

I second what Ken said. The release that I made is basically against cturtle, so if you svn up (or wait for the deb) you 
should get the new changes instantly. I was expecting that an experienced point cloud user like you would be on trunk by 
now though ;)

Cheers,
Radu.

On 08/11/2010 11:41 AM, Ken Conley wrote:
> Hi Jared,
>
> You should keep using cturtle. It will continue to receive updates to pcl.
>
> 'latest' is no longer being developed -- our new bleeding edge tree
> will be called 'unstable', but we are not actively developing on it
> yet.
>
>   - Ken
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Jared Marshall Glover<jglov@mit.edu>  wrote:
>> Hi Radu,
>>
>> I'm still using cturtle, not latest.  Once we finish our book grabbing
>> demo this
>> week, I'll update to latest and give it a shot =)  Thanks for fixing it so
>> quickly.  By the way, opencv seems to have a similar problem of using degrees
>> instead of radians (e.g. in cv::getRotationMatrix2D).  Do you know if
>> there are
>> plans to adopt the same SI units convention in opencv anytime soon?
>>
>> -Jared
>>
>>
>>
>> Quoting Radu Bogdan Rusu<rusu@willowgarage.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Jared,
>>>
>>> I pushed 0.2.4 out. Can you please let me know if that fixed the problem?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Radu.
>>>
>>> On 08/10/2010 08:01 PM, Jared Marshall Glover wrote:
>>>> Hi Radu,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, after a quick grep for "180" in pcl/src, it looks like the problem
>>>> is just
>>>> in sac_segmentation.hpp, lines 153, 170, 294, and 318. But you'll also
>>>> need to
>>>> change any code (including on the wiki tutorials) that uses those models
>>>> for
>>>> segmentation.
>>>>
>>>> -Jared
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Radu Bogdan Rusu<rusu@willowgarage.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jared,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this just in sac_segmentation.hpp (153, 170), or did you find it
>>>>> anywhere else?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/10/2010 02:17 PM, Jared Marshall Glover wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Radu,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok I created a ticket. But it may be a larger issue than just
>>>>>> consistency in
>>>>>> SACSegmentation::setEpsAngle(). Also, you don't necessarily want to
>>>>>> break
>>>>>> existing code without warning. Maybe you should decide on a unit
>>>>>> system and
>>>>>> put a clear indication in the documentation that as of version XXX all
>>>>>> units
>>>>>> will be standardized?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Jared
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quoting Radu Bogdan Rusu<rusu@willowgarage.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jared,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> oops. Can you please send me a patch (ticket works too)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Radu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08/10/2010 02:05 PM, Jared Marshall Glover wrote:
>>>>>>>> There seems to be an inconsistency in PCL (at least in cturtle...I
>>>>>>>> haven't
>>>>>>>> checked latest), in that some methods take angles in radians and
>>>>>>>> some in
>>>>>>>> degrees. For example, SACSegmentation::setEpsAngle() accepts
>>>>>>>> degrees for
>>>>>>>> SACMODEL_ORIENTED_PLANE, but radians for SACMODEL_ORIENTED_LINE.
>>>>>>>> Perhaps there
>>>>>>>> should be a single convention throughout PCL to avoid confusion? It's
>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>> caused some headaches around here =)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Jared
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> ros-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>>>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> | Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> | Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>

-- 
| Radu Bogdan Rusu | http://rbrusu.com/