On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Adam Leeper wrote: > I disagree on removing sources... they are useful for reference (if you > can't get online) even if you aren't doing development on a package. Once we have a valid concept of an install target within the ros build system, I intend to automatically generate 3 debs per stack: - ros-- will contain the minimal "installed" version of the stack. Executables, libs, and exported headers only. - ros---src will additionally contain the rest of the source code for the stack. - ros---tests will contain the compiled unit-tests for the stack. > > > Adam Leeper > Stanford University > aleeper@stanford.edu > 719.358.3804 > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Konrad Banachowicz > wrote: >> >> I would go further and say that sources should be removed from debs. >> debs are not intended to be build by hand. If i want to do some devel on >> package, I will checkout code form svn. >> Pozdrawiam >> Konrad Banachowicz >> >> >> 2010/10/31 Konrad Banachowicz >>> >>> But depending on a file which should not exist is not a bug ? >>> Pozdrawiam >>> Konrad Banachowicz >>> >>> >>> 2010/10/31 Jack O'Quin >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Konrad Banachowicz >>>> wrote: >>>> > From my point of view this will not introduce new bugs,but this could >>>> > reveal >>>> > existings ones. >>>> >>>> If something worked before, then starts failing because a file it >>>> depended on was purged from the package, that seems like a "new bug" >>>> to me. >>>> -- >>>>  joq >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > >