Hi Steven The problem is in the bag file. It was recorded at a time when the ar_pose package did not use the CameraInfo topic for calibration. We later patched the code to use CameraInfo, but we haven't gotten around to recording new bags yet. Sorry for the confusion Ivan Dryanovski On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Steven Bellens wrote: > Hi, > > not sure if I should open a new topic for this, but it looks like the > ar_pose package is not functioning properly anymore. Attached is a > screenshot I get (tested on multiple computers) when running the demo > launch file demo_multi.launch with the provided bag file. The tracking > process completely mis-estimates the marker position as you can see. > I've looked into the git history to try to find any recent changes > which can explain this, but I haven't found anything useful. > Do others see the same behaviour? > Did the package recently undergo any changes which might cause this? > > regards, > > Steven > > 2010/11/8 Ivan Dryanovski : >>> First is to use arGetTransMatCont(...) which reduces jitter by using >>> previous frame estimates in the optimization process (see >>> examples/simpleTest2.c). >> >> If I recall correctly the ar_pose package uses this function by >> default - it can be disabled by setting the "use_history" parameter to >> false. >> >> Ivan >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > >