Yes Radu, it is OK :) -- Nizar SALLEM Robotics and Artificial Intelligence PhD student LAAS-CNRS 7, Avenue Colonel Roche 31077 Toulouse CEDEX 4 FRANCE On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote: > Nizar, > > Thanks again. Can you check if the updated TGZ fixed these issues? > > Cheers, > Radu. > -- > http://pointclouds.org > > On 12/21/2010 03:09 AM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote: >> I attach the patch that solves all the compilation issues since there were more. See Ticket URL: >> https://code.ros.org/trac/ros-pkg/ticket/4641 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Nizar SALLEM >> Robotics and Artificial Intelligence PhD student >> LAAS-CNRS >> 7, Avenue Colonel Roche >> 31077 Toulouse CEDEX 4 >> FRANCE >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was so excited that I gave it a try, unluckily it doesn't compile due to the presence of ROS_ERROR macro which seems >>> to be undefined in the standalone. I will put a ticket. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nizar SALLEM >>> Robotics and Artificial Intelligence PhD student >>> LAAS-CNRS >>> 7, Avenue Colonel Roche >>> 31077 Toulouse CEDEX 4 >>> FRANCE >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Radu Bogdan Rusu wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 12/21/2010 12:37 AM, Marius Muja wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> We are happy to announce the release of PCL 0.7 >>>> >>>> And just to continue with our goofy add-hoc release naming scheme (post 0.5), let's call this one: Special "FLANN is >>>> awesome" edition, as we attribute most of the algorithmic speedups to Marius! :) >>>> >>>> >>>> One more note: we also released perception_pcl_addons 0.2 (http://www.ros.org/wiki/perception_pcl_addons/ChangeList) >>>> which brings a lot of internal optimizations for speed + some new functionality to all the PCL Visualizer users. >>>> >>>> >>>> The next target is 0.8, and we'll start changing things a bit... one one hand we'll try to do a website organization >>>> with a proper wish list, bugs to fix, etc, so that more people can contribute, and on the other, we'll start dropping >>>> support for deprecated/unused classes/methods and prepare for the API review. >>>> >>>> One of the first things that we need to deprecate is the pcl_ros::Publisher/Subscriber. Thanks to Patrick's amazing >>>> work, we now have the possibility to reuse the ros::Publisher/Subscriber for pcl::PointCloud datasets. This means: >>>> * within the same process, we will just copy the pcl::PointCloud::ConstPtr >>>> * between different processes, we will send the pcl::PointCloud::ConstPtr, but with the same MD5 sum as >>>> sensor_msgs::PointCloud2 + extra logic, which means all sensor_msgs/PointCloud2 consumers will be able to consume >>>> pcl::PointCloud directly >>>> >>>> >>>> Also many many thanks to Troy for pushing the new library structure (99% done, still some work to do for 0.8), which >>>> improves things dramatically for user code compiled against PCL. Between 0.5 and 0.7 we managed to drop the memory usage >>>> during compilation from 1.3GB to ~650MB / process, which is FANTASTIC! The remaining work includes refactoring some of >>>> the internal ROS dependencies such as message_filters, or dynamic_reconfigure, which might take some time. >>>> >>>> >>>> And as Marius said, many many thanks to all the contributors and users! I'm sure we forgot some names, but they know who >>>> they are! >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Radu. >>>> -- >>>> http://pointclouds.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PCL-users@code.ros.org / http://pointclouds.org >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/pcl-users >>> >>