FYI: the new rosinstall comes with 'roslocate' bundled in.  It's still
a work in progress for your use-case, i.e. you can run:

$ roslocate info joystick_drivers
- svn:
        local-name: joystick_drivers
        uri: https://code.ros.org/svn/ros-pkg/stacks/joystick_drivers/trunk

which gives you the rosinstall fragment.  However, until we update our
indexers, it gives you the 'trunk' URL, which you probably don't want,
so you'll want to follow Tully's suggestion to get the correct URL.
In the future, you will be able to pass in a distro argument to get a
more appropriate URL.

 - Ken

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Tully Foote <tfoote@willowgarage.com> wrote:
> You can install individual stacks from the debs  ros-DISTRO-stackname  aka
> ros-diamondback-joystick-drivers-tutorials will get you the
> joystick_drivers_tutorials.
>
> rosinstall can also install them from source. You can get the development
> and release urls from the Releases page for the stack on wiki for example
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/joystick_drivers_tutorials/Releases
>
> Tully
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:54 PM, William Woodall <wjwwood@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, another thing I noticed (jut running through the tutorials with svn
>> diamondback) is that joystick_drivers is only part of the pr2 variant.  I
>> personally find those useful, maybe they should be part of desktop-full?
>>  The reason I noticed is because joystick_drivers_tutorials (which is
>> turtle_teleop) isn't included so you hit a problem in the tutorials.
>> Also, in cases like these, is there a way to install individual stacks
>> with rosinstall?
>> Thanks,
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> William Woodall
>> Graduate Software Engineering
>> Auburn University
>> w@auburn.edu
>> wjwwood@gmail.com
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Ken Conley <kwc@willowgarage.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report.  desktop now extends ros-full, and I've updated
>>> the rosdep rule as well.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Ken
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:43 PM, William Woodall <wjwwood@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I was trying out the Diamondback Beta on my macbook and I started out
>>> > trying
>>> > the desktop-full variant.  I noticed, however, that this doesn't pull
>>> > in the
>>> > rx and documentation stacks (doesn't extend the rose-full variant).  I
>>> > was
>>> > wondering if this was intentional.  I solved the problem in the short
>>> > term
>>> > by rosinstall'ing the ros-full variant to pull these in.  The reason I
>>> > ask
>>> > is that desktop-full pulls rviz, but rviz seemed to need the rx stack
>>> > to
>>> > compile...
>>> > Also, for the rosdep.yaml on OS X using macports, wxpython calls for
>>> > the
>>> > python-cairo package which doesn't exist.  This package is actually
>>> > called
>>> > py26-cairo in macports.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> > William Woodall
>>> > Graduate Software Engineering
>>> > Auburn University
>>> > w@auburn.edu
>>> > wjwwood@gmail.com
>>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > ros-users mailing list
>>> > ros-users@code.ros.org
>>> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-users mailing list
>>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tully Foote
> Systems Engineer
> Willow Garage, Inc.
> tfoote@willowgarage.com
> (650) 475-2827
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>