I've renamed to LurkerLink, thanks. Would you be willing to add documentation/motivation below? http://www.ros.org/wiki/WikiMacros - Ken On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Patrick Bouffard wrote: > I like the option of having both. Only the Lurker one allows linking > to a specific message, but as you point out, LurkerSearch is a bit > easier to understand. > > Maybe rename Lurker to LurkerLink or LurkerURL or something? > > Pat > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Ken Conley wrote: >> Any preference for one or the other?  If we keep both, I'd probably >> want to rename the 'Lurker' one to better distinguish them. >> >>  - Ken >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Patrick Bouffard >> wrote: >>> Looks great Ken. Thanks for implementing that! >>> >>> Pat >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Ken Conley wrote: >>>> I done two prototypes here: >>>> >>>> http://www.ros.org/wiki/KenConley >>>> >>>> <> >>>> <> >>>> <> >>>> >>>> In the case of LurkerSearch, you can use any number of search arguments. >>>> >>>> Thus far, I'm preferring the 'Search' macro as the arguments I think >>>> are easier to explain -- basically anything you would type into the >>>> search box. >>>> >>>>  - Ken >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Patrick Bouffard >>>> wrote: >>>>> Good points Eric. >>>>> >>>>> Probably the tree view is better for threads. Looking at bit more at >>>>> the Lurker URLs, I think we can actually get both behaviours with one >>>>> macro: >>>>> >>>>> <> >>>>> >>>>> ...translates to: >>>>> >>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/.en.html >>>>> >>>>> ...and can be, for a link to a particular message: >>>>> >>>>> message/ >>>>> >>>>> ...or for its associated thread: >>>>> >>>>> thread/ >>>>> >>>>> Pat >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Perko wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Bouffard >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that it's simply: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@th:.en.html >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This error page is actually pretty >>>>>> revealing: https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.0000000@ml:ros-users,th:d2ff88fe.en.xml . >>>>>> Note that at the end it specifies what format it expects. The Date/Time >>>>>> included in there seems to be what the "Jump" button at the bottom of the >>>>>> search page sets. For displaying a single thread it probably doesn't matter. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The 20380101 looks to be a default date that's far in the future. I >>>>>>> noticed that the same result will come up with the mailing list name >>>>>>> added, i.e.: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@ml:ros-users,th:d2ff88fe.en.xml >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And this might be good to add to the macro even if only the id is >>>>>>> required to specify the thread completely--that way by looking at the >>>>>>> link you're about to click you can see what list it will be taking you >>>>>>> to. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So how about: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lurker<> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> becomes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@ml:,th:.en.xml >>>>>> >>>>>> Another option would be to bypass the search completely and go straight to >>>>>> the thread view. >>>>>> e.g.: https://code.ros.org/lurker/thread/20090401.024344.009c814d.en.html . >>>>>> That seems to be formatted like .>>>>> interface>.html . The date/time in that case corresponds to the date that >>>>>> the thread was started. There is a similar syntax for the /message if we >>>>>> wanted to be able to link to a specific message. >>>>>> Is it more useful to have the search view for the thread or the the tree >>>>>> view for the thread? >>>>>> - Eric >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pat >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Ken Conley wrote: >>>>>>> > This does sound useful.  If you can figure out the algorithm/API for >>>>>>> > expanding >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > d2ff88fe >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > to >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@th:d2ff88fe.en.html >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I would be happy to turn it into a macro on our Wiki.  I don't know >>>>>>> > enough about Lurker and the URL-generation scheme isn't as obvious as >>>>>>> > our other macros (e.g. Youtube, Trac). >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >  - Ken >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Patrick Bouffard >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >> It's often the case that for some particular item on the wiki there is >>>>>>> >> much more information available in discussions in the mailing lists, >>>>>>> >> though it's not practical (or even a good idea) to add all that detail >>>>>>> >> to the wiki itself. As the list archives grow however it's becoming >>>>>>> >> harder to find relevant information by a simple keyword search. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> We can currently link to wiki pages from the mailing list simply by >>>>>>> >> pasting in the appropriate URL. Could we also enable the reverse, with >>>>>>> >> a wiki macro that links to the lurker archive of a particular thread? >>>>>>> >> Similar to the bug tracker macro. So something like: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> <> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> e.g., >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> <> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> .. would expand to: >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@th:d2ff88fe.en.html >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> And would be rendered with something like *[ML], where * is a little >>>>>>> >> envelope icon or something like that. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Then in the wiki we can add these links pointing to discussion threads >>>>>>> >> that are relevant to that part of the wiki. This could include threads >>>>>>> >> on ros-developers that relate to design decisions, or threads on >>>>>>> >> ros-users that have some detailed discussion on some feature. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> I'm not sure if this is technically possible, but perhaps the mailing >>>>>>> >> list could even be configured so that the lurker thread id is printed >>>>>>> >> at the bottom of every message to make it dead easy to know what >>>>>>> >> thread id to use. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>>>> >> Pat >>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> >> ros-users mailing list >>>>>>> >> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>>> >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > ros-users mailing list >>>>>>> > ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>>> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ros-users mailing list >>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >