Done. Thanks again. Pat On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Ken Conley wrote: > I've renamed to LurkerLink, thanks. > > Would you be willing to add documentation/motivation below? > > http://www.ros.org/wiki/WikiMacros > >  - Ken > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Patrick Bouffard > wrote: >> I like the option of having both. Only the Lurker one allows linking >> to a specific message, but as you point out, LurkerSearch is a bit >> easier to understand. >> >> Maybe rename Lurker to LurkerLink or LurkerURL or something? >> >> Pat >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Ken Conley wrote: >>> Any preference for one or the other?  If we keep both, I'd probably >>> want to rename the 'Lurker' one to better distinguish them. >>> >>>  - Ken >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Patrick Bouffard >>> wrote: >>>> Looks great Ken. Thanks for implementing that! >>>> >>>> Pat >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Ken Conley wrote: >>>>> I done two prototypes here: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ros.org/wiki/KenConley >>>>> >>>>> <> >>>>> <> >>>>> <> >>>>> >>>>> In the case of LurkerSearch, you can use any number of search arguments. >>>>> >>>>> Thus far, I'm preferring the 'Search' macro as the arguments I think >>>>> are easier to explain -- basically anything you would type into the >>>>> search box. >>>>> >>>>>  - Ken >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Patrick Bouffard >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Good points Eric. >>>>>> >>>>>> Probably the tree view is better for threads. Looking at bit more at >>>>>> the Lurker URLs, I think we can actually get both behaviours with one >>>>>> macro: >>>>>> >>>>>> <> >>>>>> >>>>>> ...translates to: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/.en.html >>>>>> >>>>>> ...and can be, for a link to a particular message: >>>>>> >>>>>> message/ >>>>>> >>>>>> ...or for its associated thread: >>>>>> >>>>>> thread/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Pat >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Eric Perko wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Bouffard >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think that it's simply: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@th:.en.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This error page is actually pretty >>>>>>> revealing: https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.0000000@ml:ros-users,th:d2ff88fe.en.xml . >>>>>>> Note that at the end it specifies what format it expects. The Date/Time >>>>>>> included in there seems to be what the "Jump" button at the bottom of the >>>>>>> search page sets. For displaying a single thread it probably doesn't matter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The 20380101 looks to be a default date that's far in the future. I >>>>>>>> noticed that the same result will come up with the mailing list name >>>>>>>> added, i.e.: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@ml:ros-users,th:d2ff88fe.en.xml >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And this might be good to add to the macro even if only the id is >>>>>>>> required to specify the thread completely--that way by looking at the >>>>>>>> link you're about to click you can see what list it will be taking you >>>>>>>> to. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So how about: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lurker<> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> becomes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@ml:,th:.en.xml >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Another option would be to bypass the search completely and go straight to >>>>>>> the thread view. >>>>>>> e.g.: https://code.ros.org/lurker/thread/20090401.024344.009c814d.en.html . >>>>>>> That seems to be formatted like .>>>>>> interface>.html . The date/time in that case corresponds to the date that >>>>>>> the thread was started. There is a similar syntax for the /message if we >>>>>>> wanted to be able to link to a specific message. >>>>>>> Is it more useful to have the search view for the thread or the the tree >>>>>>> view for the thread? >>>>>>> - Eric >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pat >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Ken Conley wrote: >>>>>>>> > This does sound useful.  If you can figure out the algorithm/API for >>>>>>>> > expanding >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > d2ff88fe >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > to >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@th:d2ff88fe.en.html >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I would be happy to turn it into a macro on our Wiki.  I don't know >>>>>>>> > enough about Lurker and the URL-generation scheme isn't as obvious as >>>>>>>> > our other macros (e.g. Youtube, Trac). >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >  - Ken >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Patrick Bouffard >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >> It's often the case that for some particular item on the wiki there is >>>>>>>> >> much more information available in discussions in the mailing lists, >>>>>>>> >> though it's not practical (or even a good idea) to add all that detail >>>>>>>> >> to the wiki itself. As the list archives grow however it's becoming >>>>>>>> >> harder to find relevant information by a simple keyword search. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> We can currently link to wiki pages from the mailing list simply by >>>>>>>> >> pasting in the appropriate URL. Could we also enable the reverse, with >>>>>>>> >> a wiki macro that links to the lurker archive of a particular thread? >>>>>>>> >> Similar to the bug tracker macro. So something like: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> <> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> e.g., >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> <> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> .. would expand to: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> https://code.ros.org/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@th:d2ff88fe.en.html >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> And would be rendered with something like *[ML], where * is a little >>>>>>>> >> envelope icon or something like that. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Then in the wiki we can add these links pointing to discussion threads >>>>>>>> >> that are relevant to that part of the wiki. This could include threads >>>>>>>> >> on ros-developers that relate to design decisions, or threads on >>>>>>>> >> ros-users that have some detailed discussion on some feature. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> I'm not sure if this is technically possible, but perhaps the mailing >>>>>>>> >> list could even be configured so that the lurker thread id is printed >>>>>>>> >> at the bottom of every message to make it dead easy to know what >>>>>>>> >> thread id to use. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >> Pat >>>>>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> >> ros-users mailing list >>>>>>>> >> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>>>> >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> > ros-users mailing list >>>>>>>> > ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>>>> > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ros-users mailing list >>>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ros-users mailing list >>>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ros-users mailing list >>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >