2011/2/15 Bill Morris : > I'm not at the lab at the moment, but as far as I know the master branch > should be working. You may also want to look at the experimental branch > which is getting closer to release. Also, I should have debian packages > out by Friday. > > One thing to watch out for with the XBee interface is that the maximum > polling frequency is lower. I tested again and it seems to be working. I noticed that a couple of parameters changed name (port, speed, frequency), which was probably where I went wrong. Steven > > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:08 +0100, Steven Bellens wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Been a while since I used the asctec_autopilot node for communication >> with the Pelican. I build the master branch and tried to launch it, >> but somehow communication is not setup properly - it gives me some >> error about 'insufficient data' when I try to read from the Pelican. I >> switched back to the code I was working on last year (somewhere mid >> august) which works fine (/origin/sbellens). >> Checking the diff I see a lot of the low-level communication commands >> have been rewritten and header fields are added to the ROS messages. >> Can someone confirm whether the current code works with the Pelican >> helicopter? Do I have to add something in my client code to get >> up-to-date? I'm still using the XBee communication interface. >> >> regards, >> >> Steven >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >