On 11/02/2011 05:28 PM, Ken Conley wrote:
>
> I'm definitely for such a feature, though, like Felix, I'm not sure
> they belong with rosmsg/rossrv as there is a bit of a abstraction loss
> there; either that, or rosmsg/srv need a first-class notion of the
> YAML form of messages.  Right now the YAML form is implicit and the
> code APIs are generally marked for internal use only.
To me it seems then that it would maybe fit into rospy as a script?
rostopic and rosservice would not need to depend on it, only rosbash
completion would for rostopic and rosservice.