Hi, what about "official" Python 3 support, at least in the core libraries? I'm asking specifically because we're currently using Blender and/or MORSE, which requires Python 3. The TUM guys have already done some work to port ROS messaging to Python 3, but as far as I know that is not official, yet. cheers, Ingo On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Ken Conley wrote: > 2011/11/7 Stéphane Magnenat : >> Hello, >> >> What is the plan w.r.t. C++11? Now that the standard is out, and that a >> large part of features are available in recent g++ releases, we will see >> many upstream libraries going for it. As upstream developer, it is clearly >> always a question of whether to adopt such a recent standard, but given the >> huge speed-up in development it brings in some cases, I have decided to go >> for using features that are at least in gcc 4.4. > > The topic wasn't brought up during the Thirdparty SIG meeting.  The > approximation of that topic is that Lucid is the current lower > watermark (gcc 4.4) for integration in Fuerte and Groovy will move to > Oneiric (gcc 4.6). > > GCC C++ 11 status (still 'experimental'): http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html > > It's always possible to reconvene the SIG to discuss C++ 11 more > specifically; I'm coordinator but I do not pretend to be knowledgeable > in that issue. > >  - Ken > >> >> To allow integration of recent code from research, I think that ROS should, >> whenever possible, embrace C++11. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Stéphane >> >> -- >> Dr Stéphane Magnenat >> http://stephane.magnenat.net >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > -- Ingo Lütkebohle Bielefeld University http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~iluetkeb/ PGP Fingerprint 3187 4DEC 47E6 1B1E 6F4F  57D4 CD90 C164 34AD CE5B