I have updated the REP. We've received a lot of +1s on this one with the issues around the gripper addressed, so barring any objections, I'm inclined to mark this one 'Active'. (speak now or forever hold your piece) - Ken On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Thomas Moulard wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Jack O'Quin wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Thomas Moulard wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jack O'Quin wrote: >> >>>> REP-0103 says: >>>> >>>>  "In relation to a body the standard is: x forward, y left, z up". >>>> >>>> While "up" may seem arbitrary for a gripper, "forward" suggests the >>>> direction to which it is extended. >>> >>> Sorry for the delay. >>> What would be your proposition, removing the scheme and just adding that >>> the frames is oriented as X toward the object and Y the object main axis? >> >> Definitely, X toward the object. >> >> I propose Y to be the main dimension in which the "fingers" of the >> gripper move. Some hand-like or claw-like devices may not fit that >> notion very well, but it can probably be defined in a way that is at >> least understandable. >> >> Z would be the remaining dimension, orthogonal to X and Y. > > Ok. I updated the REP to match the new orientation. > Is there any additional suggestions? > -- > Thomas Moulard > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >