On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ken Conley wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Jack O'Quin wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Ken Conley wrote: >>> BTW: PCL in Fuerte is roughly equivalent to pcl-all, but they are >>> *not* the same debs as in the ppa. It should be possible in the future >>> to produce an equivalent set of separate debs. >> >> Is there any hope of getting a stripped-down pcl_common into Fuerte? >> The `pcl_ros` package should really only depend on that, a significant >> special case. > > Probably not. That's definitely first freeze material and the sort of > thing that always bites us badly if we attempt to repackage this late. Sad, but true. --  joq