2012/3/8 Martin Günther <mguenthe@uos.de>:

>> What do you think? Are there people interested in such interface?
>> Should we make a REP?
>
> I would be interested in such an interface, but I'm not sure if enough
> other people are to justify a REP (comments, anyone?). Maybe you just go
> on and define these messages in a separate message package (what about
> the name htn_msgs or htn_planning_msgs?), and others can adapt it.

I suggest starting with an API review for your specific
implementation. That will likely provide useful feedback, and enable
other ROS users to experiment with your stack.

Once we have more widespread understanding, a REP could follow.
-- 
 joq