Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. I definitely agree that the link with the
multi-master/multi-robot question is relevant.

I wonder also how that would fit in/with the "Next Generation/IDL"
SIGs: http://ros.org/wiki/groovy/Planning/RosNG / msgIDL /nodeIDL
I would think that this could be kept orthogonal, but feedback from
the organisers there would be helpful.

Best


On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jeff Rousseau <jrousseau@aptima.com>
<jrousseau@aptima.com> wrote:
> Having a ROS Transport SIG would be great.  Discussions of various
> transports have come up now and again on the multi-master SIG list which I
> think conflates the two topics.  Each (multi-robot/multi-master and
> transports), although often related, should really be addressed separately.
>
>
>


-- 
Cedric Pradalier