Joining the RosNG SIG would make sense to me.
I'll add the topic there then.

Thanks for the feedback so far.

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Karan, Cem F CIV (US)
<cem.f.karan.civ@mail.mil> wrote:
> Should we join the RosNG SIG, or is there a different one planned for this?
>
> Thanks,
> Cem Karan
>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 5
>>Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:56:57 -0500
>>From: "Jack O'Quin" <jack.oquin@gmail.com>
>>To: User discussions <ros-users@code.ros.org>
>>Subject: Re: [ros-users] Making message transport more modular?
>>Message-ID:
>>       <CAB6SgyUzZE+vNAvkDVmCawOGMJVOvzMXDUJAbtwNDYW3pCmx2A@mail.gmail.com>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>>On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Damon Kohler <damonkohler@google.com>
>>wrote:
>>> FYI, this is something people were discussing at ROSCon and will
>>> probably be covered as part of the nextgen ROS SIG:
>>>
>>> http://www.ros.org/wiki/groovy/Planning/RosNG
>>
>>I agree with Damon that the networking discussions should be held
>>jointly, even if the eventual solutions end up being orthogonal.
>>--
>>?joq
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users



-- 
Cedric Pradalier