On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Dirk Thomas wrote: > On 26.07.2012 07:21, Jack O'Quin wrote: >> >> >> I want to start working with Dirk's prototype as soon as possible; I >> expect it will continue to evolve, that's OK. Others who are concerned >> about this transition should join in. > > > Currently my working copy of catkin is pretty much taken apart. > I have the basic workspace chaining working in build-space (only tested with > a handful of dummy stacks). > The install case is currently broken and I am working on that. > > As soon as it is able to support at least the feature set catkin currently > does I am looking forward to push the changes to the official catkin repo at > github. > I think it will take several more days until that point is reached. OK. I'll watch for updates on https://github.com/ros/catkin Even without install working, it should be possible to build and run some stacks with minimal dependencies, right? >> Please join the buildsystem SIG (and mailing list) and help make this >> transition smoother: >> >> http://ros.org/wiki/groovy/Planning/Buildsystem >> > > I think it would be a good idea to continue this discussion on the SIG > mailing list. > Even if the topic is of broad interest I suspect that there a number of > people subscribed to ro-users which are not focused on that topic. +1 I wanted to discuss REP-0122 issues, but there is understandable, widespread interest in the larger topic. Let's leave ros-users in peace for a while and move to ros-sig-buildsystem. -- joq