A Dimecres 03 Octubre 2012, Rich Mattes va escriure: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > First of all I have noticed that there are several packages that has a > > dependency a pcl package, when there's no pcl package, but there's a system > > dependency pcl. So, I have to change several manifest files from > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > Also, I have not be able to found which version of pcl is needed for fuerte > > (1.5, 1.6) With 1.6 it doesn't compile. > > > > > > We had a lot of fun trying to figure this out in Fedora[1] as well. As it > turns out, you can't use the upstream PCL release for Fuerte, you need a > custom branch of PCL hosted on github[2] which contains extra message > definitions and stack metadata. I raised the issue upstream[3] and it > looks like we have to wait for PCL 2.0 for ROS to build against PCL as a > stand-alone library instead of requiring that PCL be modified. We're going > to try to patch Fedora's system PCL to make it a hybrid ROS stack and > stand-alone library so that ROS is usable until this situation is resolved. > It seems this issue is pretty[4] common[5]. Well, we want something similar. A PCL version stand-alone that could be used by ros. I have seen the github code, and it doesn't seems that use the ROS stuff, although is required by cmake. From a ROS full installation (188) packages I have compiled 106, considering that pcl is not built or installed. I hope to have something functional some day ... Thanks for the info. Leo > > Rich > > [1] > http://answers.ros.org/question/34693/trying-to-compile-perception_pcl-122- for-fuerte/ > [2] https://github.com/wg-debs/pcl/tree/debian/ros-fuerte-pcl_1.5.2_precise > [3] http://dev.pointclouds.org/issues/699 > [4] > http://answers.ros.org/question/43129/pcl_ros-build-error-in-fuerte-on- fedora-17-x64/ > [5] > http://answers.ros.org/question/38193/cant-build-fuerte-in-fedora-fails-on- rosdep/ > -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia