On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Marcus Liebhardt wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Tully Foote > wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> Thanks for the interest. Based on the interest we have setup a SIG for >> this. I encourage you to join if you have time to participate. > > > I wonder, if it is necessary to create an extra SIG for this. Although the > group of people interested in ROS on ARM has grown to a significant size, > there are still not so many people out there. > In order to avoid people getting scattered all over the place (and might > even lost), I suggest we use the existing Embedded SIG > (http://www.ros.org/wiki/sig/Embedded) for this. > It gathers people interesting in and working on different embedded levels, > such as ROS on ARMs running Linux distributions and ROS on/with "bare-metal" > embedded boards. > If this list/group gets to busy in the future, we still could split it up in > different groups later. As a lurker on the ros-sig-embedded list, I agree with Markus. Unless we really have two distinct communities, "embedded" and "arm," it would seem that one group is enough. brian.