On 08.02.2013 14:46, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Or is this simply a glitch in the package.xml and the line with LGPL should be removed?
It is a glitch., though harmless:

The licenses in the metapackage package.xml
only affect the files inside the metapackage folder itself, so really
only that package.xml itself.

Packages are not "part of" a metapackage, they are merely
"referenced by" zero to many metapackages.