On 08.02.2013 15:21, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> It is harmless, but I want to use the license information for automatic checks of licensing issues.
> So it might be nice if the information is set up correctly.

Are you planning on something generic? I could image something like
"rospack license" in rospack similar to "rospack depends" is quite
useful.

Best,
   Christian



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ros-users-bounces@code.ros.org [mailto:ros-users-bounces@code.ros.org] Im Auftrag von Thibault Kruse
> Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Februar 2013 15:02
> An: ros-users@code.ros.org
> Betreff: Re: [ros-users] What is LGPL licensed in roscpp_core metapackage?
>
> On 08.02.2013 14:46, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>> Or is this simply a glitch in the package.xml and the line with LGPL should be removed?
> It is a glitch., though harmless:
>
> The licenses in the metapackage package.xml only affect the files inside the metapackage folder itself, so really only that package.xml itself.
>
> Packages are not "part of" a metapackage, they are merely "referenced by" zero to many metapackages.
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>


-- 
Albert-Ludwigs-University
Institute of Computer Science
Research Group Foundations of Artificial Intelligence
Georges-Köhler-Allee 52
79110 Freiburg
Phone: +49 761 203 8225