Is Hudson only running Precise, amd64 pre-release tests these days? I have not gotten any other responses, and don't see anything in the queue. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Tully Foote wrote: > Ahh that makes sense. Sorry I looked at master which was catkinized. Yes, > that error will occur if you are setting a package dependency outside of the > declared stack dependencies. rostest is in the ros_comm stack not the ros > stack. If you depend on packages in the ros "stack/metapackage" you need to > have it in your stack.xml, with the packages in your manifest. The ros > dependency brings in most of the build system so it's basically required, > though you can improperly depend on dependencies like ros_comm to bring it > in for you. > > Tully > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Jack O'Quin wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Jack O'Quin wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Tully Foote >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm not sure what's going on here. In groovy you will get that error >> >> if a dependency which is supposed to be a ros package doesn't exist on your >> >> path. The tools will then assume it must be a rosdep if it's not an >> >> existing package. I'll look into it tomorrow. I think it might be that the >> >> prerelease is installing the union of build and run depends, skipping the >> >> test_depends. If that's true, then rostest won't be installed, if that's >> >> how it should be will take a trip to the white board with some sketching to >> >> answer. >> > >> > That groovy-devel branch of camera1394 on github now has a > > package="rostest" />. I would not expect that to be interpreted as a >> > test_depends. >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/ros-drivers/camera1394/blob/groovy-devel/manifest.xml >> > >> > Is there some other than "ros" needed in the stack.xml for >> > rostest to be accessible? >> >> Looks like the "ros" stack dependency no longer works. I added > stack="ros_comm" />, and the pre-release tests seem to work now. That >> must be why rostest was not getting installed. >> >> If the tests all succeed, I will release camera1394-1.8.1 to Groovy soon. >> >> Is the stack dependency on "ros" even needed these days? Without >> rosstack, it's hard to figure out the correct dependencies for dry >> stacks. >> -- >> joq > > > > > -- > Tully Foote > tfoote@willowgarage.com > (650) 475-2827 -- joq