On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Tully Foote wrote: > Hi Jack, > > It looks like you fixed the issue in: > https://github.com/ros-drivers/camera1394/commit/8568997546fa76e207d04798cb09e0e213609891 > However the job you linked us to was still building 1.9.0 not 1.9.1. If you > update the version I'd expect it to work. You should just have to submit a > pull request to ros/rosdistro for the new verslon. Thanks, that's encouraging. I really hope that fix will work. When it appeared to fail, I was running out of ideas. But, I had missed one of the steps in the release process without realizing it. I hope camera1394-1.9.1 does fix that problem. I've been unable to reproduce the failure any other way, and there was very little debugging information in the console output. Assuming the incorrect reference to roslib is indeed the bug, I can understand why it works on my development system because roslib is already installed there. But, isn't this the sort of error pre-release tests are intended to find? Why did that also succeed? Is roslib getting installed there by mistake or as a side-effect of some other package? How much does the pre-release build differ from the binarydeb build? -- joq