On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Gonzalo Abella wrote: > Thank you very much for your answers. They are all pretty helpful. A > brief summarize: > - But (a possibility), rely on a simple key-value DB as Redis to > minimize development/maintenance. +1 to redis > - Priorities to initialize parameters: (0) default values, (1) launch > files, (2) parameter server, (3) command line. +number -> +priority Not sure why the server needs to worry about this. Parameters get set whenever someone sets them. Not your responsibility, its under user control. > The params lifecycle is a tricky problem. I think the best solution > would be a combination of both live/die with paramserver and live/die > with parent. It is reasonable to have global parameters which do not > depend on any node (or depend on the ROS Master). But other > parameters, such as private params, are meaningless and they should be > removed from the param server. Beware: in the existing implementation, parameters live and die with the parameter server (currently roscore). That is often useful. * I often find myself starting roscore first just so I don't have to reload parameters every time I test some node. * Sometimes parameters may be adjusted during node execution. If they are destroyed when the node terminates, we lose the opportunity to save them somewhere for the next session. * For general compatibility, interface issues like this should not be changed without a compelling reason. -- joq