On 13.06.2013 15:03, Dirk Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> The temporary fix to check them out and build them locally works
>>> since the issue has been fixed in the source repositories.
>>
>> Yup. I can confirm that this current fix is working. :)
>
> But even when building a dry package with messages from source I don't get any lisp files.
> So I would suspect that your workaround to build from source does not work for dry stuff.
> Can you confirm that?
> Above it sounds like a build from source would work for you.
> Is that also true for dry stuff?

Well, I see why it will work in your from-source-build.
You do have roslisp installed.

The buildfarm will only install dependencies explicitly stated by the package when building and packaging it.
So dry packages lack a dependency on roslisp if lisp messages should be generated for them.
I will see how we can work around that - since roslisp is not part of ros_comm anymore since Lorenz extracted it into a separate repo end of last year.

- Dirk