what do you think about unifying the BoundingBox2D.msg and BoundingBox3D.msg messages? we could have the three fields (or vector) to the bounding box size and, in the case it is a 2d bounding box, the Z field would be zero. I think we would gain in simplicity, in a similar way we have a pose message (geometry_msgs/Pose) that is generic and serves both 2d and 3d poses, according to what is set in Z. --- [Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/proposal-new-computer-vision-message-standards/1819/23) or reply to this email to respond. If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates. ______________________________________________________________________________ ros-users mailing list ros-users@lists.ros.org http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users Unsubscribe: