[quote="ruffsl, post:15, topic:2467, full:true"] [quote="gavanderhoorn, post:14, topic:2467"] Ive always wondered why that was/is done: earlier versions of packages arent retained in reprepro repositories, so wouldnt the Docker build just fail if the package isnt found anymore? [/quote] This was done intentionally for the official images just for that purpose. [/quote] Ok. Makes sense. [quote="ruffsl, post:15, topic:2467, full:true"] [quote="gavanderhoorn, post:14, topic:2467"] Also: only the top-level metapackage is pinned right? [/quote] In the dockerfile for the official images, only the target application focused packages are pinned. There are sometimes other supporting packages installed, but are not necessarily pinned, e.g. `gnupg2`. [/quote] I was actually thinking of whether the metapackages themselves do any version pinning (as in: in their `Depends` fields). But that doesn't appear so. The current setup appears to work because the repositories don't retain any old packages. --- [Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/announcing-ros-docker-images-for-arm-and-debian/2467/16) or reply to this email to respond. If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates. ______________________________________________________________________________ ros-users mailing list ros-users@lists.ros.org http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users Unsubscribe: