> Using ROS 1 and ROS 2 side by side using [https://github.com/ros2/ros1_bridge ](https://github.com/ros2/ros1_bridge) works perfectly as we have detailed in our ROSCon talk Taken from https://github.com/ros2/ros1_bridge * "support is limited to only the message/service types available at compile time of the bridge" * "topics will only be bridged when matching publisher-subscriber pairs are active for a topic on either side of the bridge" * "building the ROS 1 bridge can consume a tremendous amount of memory" * "first building everything else as usual, then coming back to build the ROS 1 bridge" * " `CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH` must not contain paths from ROS 1 which would overlay ROS 2 packages" * "The bridge will be built with support for any message/service packages that are on your path and have an associated mapping between ROS 1 and ROS 2" * " This can be done by adding explicit dependencies on the message/service packages to the `package.xml` of the bridge" That's a lot of hoops to jump through, wouldn't call it "works perfectly". Just saying. --- [Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/discussion-on-ros-to-ros2-transition-plan/6155/79) or reply to this email to respond. If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates. ______________________________________________________________________________ ros-users mailing list ros-users@lists.ros.org http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users Unsubscribe: