I do not have experience with ROS 2, but your points regarding integration testing sound valid. > Do above tests make sense? Yes, at least for the major part. I have been working on random testing and property-based testing myself, at the node/integration level, although for ROS 1. I had this idea of expanding mutation testing in ROS, in which the ROS primitives could be mutated themselves in a meaningful way (i.e. redirecting topics, messing with queue sizes, changing callback functions to a simple *skip* or *abort*), although I am not sure how useful that would be in practice. > Is it possible to pack them all into one single framework? Is there any advantage to packing all these different kinds of tests into a single framework? It could prove hard to do so in a way that is intuitive for the user. --- [Visit Topic](https://discourse.ros.org/t/integration-testing-in-ros-2/6859/2) or reply to this email to respond. If you do not want to receive messages from ros-users please use the unsubscribe link below. If you use the one above, you will stop all of ros-users from receiving updates. ______________________________________________________________________________ ros-users mailing list ros-users@lists.ros.org http://lists.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users Unsubscribe: