Ok no worries Sachin, I just wasn't sure if it was purposeful or not. I just saw it and thought it peculiar as I was trying to adapt it to our robot. They were all 0.1 different, so I thought maybe it was a safety... but then that confused me cause errors would arise. I'll correct it in my own too then. I was going to mention the acquisition of the elements from the urdf, and the lack of acceleration in the urdf, but that's exactly your ticket. Great :) On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Sachin Chitta wrote: > Hi Ben, > > I have a ticket open on this very issue: > https://code.ros.org/trac/ros-pkg/ticket/4118 > > The joint limits information in the future (once I service the ticket) will > come from the urdf with the option of overriding the urdf using the > specification in the yaml file. > > Sachin > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Ben Rudder wrote: > >> Hi again all >> >> Just a question, with pr2_arm_navigation stack, in particular >> .._config/config/joint_limits.yaml , is there a reason that the limits >> specified here are outside the defined limits in the urdf files? >> >> Thanks, Ben >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ros-users mailing list >> ros-users@code.ros.org >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >> >> > > > -- > Sachin Chitta > Research Scientist > Willow Garage > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > >