I checked that both boxturtle and latest are updated to most recent and then
ran camera_calibration on a 320x240 image pair using both.

When I run it using latest, the bottom half of the image window shows
spurious noise, and when I click calibrate it fails complaining about size
mismatches.

When I run it using Boxturtle it works fine.

So my question is: if this problem is fixed in boxturtle, shouldn't it also
be fixed in latest? Or am I misunderstanding how the boxturtle/latest stuff
works?

Thanks,
Adam


Adam Leeper
Stanford University
aleeper@stanford.edu
719.358.3804


On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Patrick Mihelich
<mihelich@willowgarage.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> image_pipeline 1.0.4 and 1.1.6 have been released into Boxturtle and
> latest, respectively. 1.1.6 is a bug-fix release to improve
> camera_calibration's handling of non-640x480 image streams. 1.0.4 backports
> improvements to camera_calibration from the 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 releases.
>
> Changelist <http://www.ros.org/wiki/image_pipeline/ChangeList>:
> 1.1.6 (2010-06-01)
>
> camera_calibration:
>
>    - Fixed to work with arbitrary size images, not only 640x480.
>    - Regression tests for multiple image sizes.
>    - Fixed cosmetic problem in update of small images.
>
> 1.0.4 (2010-06-01) Back-ports bug-fixes to camera_calibration in 1.1.5 and
> 1.1.6.
>
>
> -Patrick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>