Michal, I'd also suggest that you try running roswtf when things are running with problems. That has a tf plugin to try to help detect common problems. Tully On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Brian Gerkey wrote: > hi Michal, > > The fact that it's only rarely received incorrectly is peculiar. > Sounds like part of the system is occasionally, or slowly, publishing > a conflicting transform. I would log all the tf data during a run: > rosbag record tf > Then search through the resulting bag for the problem. Something like > this will pull out all the messages that declare a transform with > base_footprint as the child: > rosbag filter in.bag out.bag 'topic == "tf" and > m.transforms[0].header.frame_id == "base_footprint"' > (where in.bag should be replaced by the name of bag created by the > record step). You can examine the filtered data with rostopic: > rostopic echo -b out.bag tf > Presumably, in that data stream, you'll see occasional conflicting > declarations of the parent of base_footprint. > > brian. > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:42 AM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > thanks for the reply. Gmapping is configured with name="odom_frame" > > value="odom_combined"/> > > > > i'm launching this configuration: > > > > > > > > > > > > /> > > > > > > > > > > where slam_gmapping.xml is: > > > > > > > output="screen"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes (quite rarely) the transform is received correctly. > > > > Thanks very much, > > > > Michal > > > >> Perhaps gmapping is configured with odom_frame == base_footprint? > >> > >> brian. > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Wim Meeussen > >> wrote: > >>> Michal, > >>> > >>>> RESULTS: for /map to /base_footprint > >>>> Chain is: /map -> /base_footprint -> /odom_combined > >>>> Net delay avg = 0.020768: max = 0.064 > >>> > >>> [...] > >>> > >>>> the only weird thing is, that in rviz the transform arrows shows like > >>>> this: /base_footprint -> /odom_combined -> /map > >>>> might this be a sign of some problem? > >>> > >>> Yes, This is most likely your problem. It appears that you have a tf > >>> publisher from map to base_footprint, and another publisher from > >>> odom_combined to base_footprint. So the base_footprint frame has two > >>> parents. In our setup we have amcl publish the transform from map to > >>> odom combined, and the robot pose ekf publish the transform from > >>> odom_combined to base_footprint. What setup are you running? Did you > >>> reconfigure amcl to publish a different tf transform? > >>> > >>> Wim > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Wim Meeussen > >>> Willow Garage Inc. > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> ros-users mailing list > >>> ros-users@code.ros.org > >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ros-users mailing list > >> ros-users@code.ros.org > >> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ros-users mailing list > > ros-users@code.ros.org > > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > -- Tully Foote Systems Engineer Willow Garage, Inc. tfoote@willowgarage.com (650) 475-2827