I disagree on removing sources... they are useful for reference (if you can't get online) even if you aren't doing development on a package. Adam Leeper Stanford University aleeper@stanford.edu 719.358.3804 On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Konrad Banachowicz wrote: > I would go further and say that sources should be removed from debs. > debs are not intended to be build by hand. If i want to do some devel on > package, I will checkout code form svn. > > Pozdrawiam > Konrad Banachowicz > > > 2010/10/31 Konrad Banachowicz > > But depending on a file which should not exist is not a bug ? >> >> Pozdrawiam >> Konrad Banachowicz >> >> >> 2010/10/31 Jack O'Quin >> >> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Konrad Banachowicz >>> wrote: >>> > From my point of view this will not introduce new bugs,but this could >>> reveal >>> > existings ones. >>> >>> If something worked before, then starts failing because a file it >>> depended on was purged from the package, that seems like a "new bug" >>> to me. >>> -- >>> joq >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ros-users mailing list >>> ros-users@code.ros.org >>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users > >