Brian, I think I remember having that conversation at some point... but now its ticketed here: https://code.ros.org/trac/ros-pkg/ticket/4599 This happens to be really easy to do, so I'll probably just put it in today. Unfortunately, I don't think this is something that can be released into C-Turtle as its an extension to the current API. So, it may have to wait for D-Turtle to go in. Hope all is well, Eitan On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Brian Gerkey wrote: > 2010/11/29 Gonçalo Cabrita : > > As far as the dwa_local_planner goes, I placed a bunch of ROS_INFO all > over > > the code to get an idea of what was going on while the robot was moving. > > Turns out our xy goal tolerance was too small. Due to the Roomba's great > > odometry (notice the sarcasm) when the robot was turning in place to > reach > > the goal heading it would sometimes become out of the xy goal, so it > would > > try to reposition itself. This would lead to the robot going for a little > > trip in order to get back on the spot. Also, the EeePCs are so amazingly > > fast (sarcasm once again!) that sometimes when the robot was rotating in > > place to get to the goal heading we would have some glitches on the > costmap > > update, which in turn would make amcl jump the robot a bit on the map, > thus > > putting the robot out of xy goal. > > There's a feature to be added, which I think Eitan and I have > discussed before: any time the xy goal tolerance is satisfied, latch > that fact, and thereafter only execute the final heading adjustment, > no matter what the apparent xy goal error is. That would protect > against both odometry drift and amcl jumps that can happen during the > final heading adjustment. This is how Player's 'wavefront' driver > works. The downside is that you no longer guarantee that the goal > tolerances are satisfied after navigation says that it reached the > goal. But I suspect that it would be a beneficial tradeoff in most > circumstances. It should be easy to hack in, and could be made an > option. > > brian. > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >