Hi Andrew, gazebo_ros_f3d returns applied forces and I just checked with rosservice call gazebo/apply_body_wrench and rxplotted the topic, and things look as expected for me. Can you describe more detail what your setup is? thanks, John On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Andy Somerville < andy.somerville@resquared.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had previous success with GazeboRosF3D in cturtle? In > attempting to use the GazeboRosF3D I've hit a bit of a wall. I believe > that I'm using it correctly and the topic is even being published to, > but I get all zeros back in situations that seem to clearly imply > there should be some forces and torques. > > My urdf entry looks like: > > > plugin="libgazebo_ros_f3d.so"> > true > 100.0 > DarmSim/${side}Arm/WAM/LowerWristFTPalmLink > DarmSim/${side}Arm/WAM/Wrist/FTSensor > DarmSim/${side}Arm/WAM/LowerWristFTPalmLink > > > > > > Where side is being filled in by "Left" and "Right", and > "DarmSim/${side}Arm/WAM/LowerWristFTPalmLink" is the name of a link > defined above the f3d entry in the xacro. > > Running the simulation produces the expected topics: > > /DarmSim/LeftArm/WAM/Wrist/FTSensor > /DarmSim/RightArm/WAM/Wrist/FTSensor > > But echoing them while performing an action that should clearly > produce a force and torque on that link consistently only produce 0s. > > I can find virtually no references to GazeboRosF3D being used in > google searches or in the stacks I have checked out with the one > exception being in > "pr2_common/pr2_description/urdf/gripper_v0/gripper.gazebo.xacro" but > that doesn't seem to be being subsequently used by anything. My next > step is to dive into the code behind GazeboRosF3D. > > Is anyone aware of some obvious factors that could explain the > behavior I'm seeing? > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > ros-users mailing list > ros-users@code.ros.org > https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users >