On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Kevin Walchko wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Patrick Mihelich wrote: > > The proposed depth image representation is *exactly* the one currently > used by the ROS OpenNI driver. The intent of this REP is to codify existing > practice. What code would need to be rewritten? > > > ok, wouldn't you have to re-write anything you want to start using > DepthImage with? Currently any packages that accept sensor_msgs/Image can > read the Kinect images … that is cool. However, now everything would have > to be re-written if you wanted it to view the kinect depth image. Maybe I > am wrong, but wouldn't that mean rviz, image_view, other user software, etc > would have to be modified to accept this new message? To me this sounds > like a big change for little gain. > There is no DepthImage message. The REP describes how to use sensor_msgs/Image to represent depths. I'll update the abstract to make the purpose and recommendations more explicit from the beginning. Cheers, Patrick