Jose,

So the official maintainer of SMACH is still Wim Meeussen, I handed it off
to him after I left Willow in late 2010, but I still jump in occasionally
to answer questions and fix bugs. SMACH is not actively developed (no new
features are planned at this time), but it should still be maintained. My
involvement has lapsed a bit over the past year, but I intend to get more
actively involved.

I'll check out the issues you raised.

thanks!
-j


On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Jose Luis Rivero <jrivero@iri.upc.edu>
 wrote:

> Hi all:
>
> Lately, we have been working with SMACH to handle our high level
> applications flow. After several days, I'm starting to think it is not
> *actively* developed by anyone. Here is why:
>
>  - There isn't a lot of activity in ROS answer about last questions[1]
>  - Last new features commits in the repo are from several months ago[2]
>  - There is an open ticket with a bug from 9 months ago[3]
>  - Wiki documentation is not complete[4]
>
> A couple of questions:
>
> 1. Is there any active maintainer or a group of people interested in?
> 2. For the PR2 (and other projects) are you still using SMACH or there
> is something else floating around?
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] http://answers.ros.org/question/12960/
>    http://answers.ros.org/question/12961/
> [2] https://kforge.ros.org/smach/executive_smach
> [3] https://code.ros.org/trac/ros-pkg/ticket/4969
> [4] http://www.ros.org/wiki/smach/Tutorials/MonitorState
>
> --
> José Luis Rivero <jrivero@iri.upc.edu>
> Institut de Robōtica i Informātica Industrial [CSIC-UPC]
> Phone: 93.4015783
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>