Hi Tang,

I'm glad to see this!  I've always liked the Razor, but it did need better
firmware.

I couldn't find a link to the firmware or your interface driver.  Can you
provide a link directly to the razor package?

---

Also, you should consider using
http://www.ros.org/wiki/depthimage_to_laserscan instead of
pointcloud_to_laserscan.  It should use a lot less CPU in most situations
and can be run on platforms without PCL.

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Tang <tang.tiong.yew@monash.edu> wrote:

> Dear ROS users,
>
> Thanks everybody for feedback. I just contributed a working sensor driver
> for Razor IMU 9 DOF sensor board. https://www.sparkfun.com/products/9623,
> my razor_imu_9dof package can handle different version of Razor board
> hardware which requires different firmware to be uploaded to the board
> (Thanks to https://dev.qu.tu-berlin.de/projects/sf-razor
> -9dof-ahrs/wiki/Tutorial which its firmware are included in this ROS
> package). On top of that, this sensor board is very accurate, responsive
> and good for robot. This version of firmware is able to be calibrated and
> thus further increase the board accuracy. Best of all, I included a 3D
> visualization testing for this package. The message node can be run as
> standalone because I had split the visualization and message node into two
> different node. Therefore it can run very fast and practical.
>
> The razor IMU board will be used in my (very) new eddiebot project as its
> IMU sensor
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/eddiebot
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/eddiebot_line_follower
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/eddiebot_head_tracking
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/eddiebot_teleop
> http://www.ros.org/wiki/eddiebot_follower
>
> Cheers
>
> Tang Tiong Yew
> Monash University
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>