On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Edwards, Shaun M. <sedwards@swri.org> wrote:

>  Looks like the discussion has died down.  I agree with Adolfo's changes
> and will incorporate them.  Unfortunately, I didn't hear an overwhelming
> response that the entire ROS community would find the status reporting
> useful.  I had hoped to incorporate the status symbols into the broader ROS
> wiki, instead of the "Industrial" sub pages.  For now I will leave the
> status descriptions where they are and mark the ROS-Industrial specific
> packages appropriately.  Maybe over time we will see if others choose to
> use them.
>

+1

I don't have much to add to what many have already posted, but I think the
need for better package status is pretty widespread.
-- 
 joq