On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Vincent Rabaud wrote: > I guess this whole conversation deserves a proper SIG no ? There seem to > be a lot of interest and several things to talk about: standards, policies, > reports, software. Actually, just came across an ABI / API breakage site > for popular open source projects : > http://upstream-tracker.org/ > Some of the ones we use in our ecosystem are there: > http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/assimp.html > http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/opencv.html > http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/pcl.html > http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/yaml-cpp.html > Either that, or take it to the already-existing build system SIG: http://wiki.ros.org/groovy/Planning/Buildsystem https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ros-sig-buildsystem -- joq