Wiki edit here . On 4 October 2013 11:39, Daniel Stonier wrote: > > > > On 3 October 2013 02:40, Jack O'Quin wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Daniel Stonier wrote: >> >>> >>> o This is probably the cause of the confusion we've had trying to >>>>> work out what pre-releases are actually building. >>>>> * Why do some have a version key and some don't? How is it >>>>> automatically added? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Nothing happens automatically for that. >>>> Whatever a maintainer puts into that file will be used: a branch name, >>>> a tag name or nothing which implies the default branch. >>>> >>>> >>> Ok, crystal now. I was wondering if source.yaml shouldn't be touched (I >>> can't remember doing any pull requests to source.yaml, just to >>> release.yaml, so something must be auto-generating the initial footprint >>> there). >>> >> >> Daniel: I think not. >> >> If you didn't add source.yaml entries, they are probably missing. I see >> no "roscon" source.yaml entries for either Groovy or Hydro. >> > > Probably should have been searching for 'rocon', not 'roscon'. > Nonetheless, I believe your comment is correct. I wonder if the older ones > were carried over from legacy packaging systems. I just noticed none of my > newer rosjava ones turned up there. > > Since bloom's configuration asks for source url's, could it validate and > send pull requests here if they are missing? Not high priority, but it > would automate a step. > > Daniel. > > PS I edited the wiki page to hint how to get devel pre-releases from > source started. It's a touch mysterious that 'devel' doesn't appear on the > pre-release web site, even after you've done a release. > >> >> That means the "devel" pre-release option will not be available for those >> packages. >> -- >> joq >> > > > -- Phone : +82-10-5400-3296 (010-5400-3296) Home: http://snorriheim.dnsdojo.com/ Yujin R&D: http://rnd.yujinrobot.com/