Steven,

The default parameters for the base_local_planner allow for a fair amount of freedom when tracking a global path. To try to get the local planner to follow your global plan more closely... I'd take a look at the following parameters: http://www.ros.org/wiki/base_local_planner#Trajectory_Scoring_Parameters. In particular, you can probably up the path_distance_bias a bit. Hopefully, playing around will get you where you want to be. If not, let us know the issues.

I know some other people have run navigation on the creates, but I don't have much experience on that platform so I'll let them chime in on their experiences.

Hope all is well,

Eitan

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Steven Martin <s34.martin@connect.qut.edu.au> wrote:
Hi Guys,

I have the Nav stack running on a couple of irobot creates we have in our lab and I have implemented my own global path planner using some optimal control stuff I have been working on. However the local DWA path planning really doesn't do a very good job at following the global path. I have had a bit of a look through the source and the paper on DWA and it should work fine for the nonholonomic robots.

I was wondering if anyone could suggest a set of parameters for the local planner? And can anyone else comment on the performance of the Nav Stack on the creates?


Cheers

Steven Martin
steven.martin@qut.edu.au

PhD Student
Queensland University of Technology
Gardens Point, S1107


_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users