Pozdrawiam
Konrad Banachowicz

2010/10/25 Ken Conley <kwc@willowgarage.com>

Hi Konrad,

As Tully notes, we don't version individual packages, only stacks. We
used to include versions numbers in stack.xml files, but came to the
opinion that it was a mistake as you would get version disagreements
between the stack.xml, which is not authoritative, and the
CMakeLists.txt file, which is. We decided to just maintain one version
number in the CMakeLists.txt for now, though this will change once our
install target develops more.

The "rosversion" command for ROS 1.3 has been updated to output the
version number of any installed stack.

- Ken

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Tully Foote <tfoote@willowgarage.com> wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> These things are not appropriate for the manifest as packages are not
> versioned, and a single version may or may not be used in multiple
> distributions. Can you provide a little bit more information on your
> usecase and where it's failing? In particular what you are doing and what
> you want it to be doing.
>
> Tully
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Konrad Banachowicz <konradb3@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I found that it's quite difficult to get information what is the version
>> of the package and on what distribution it's intended to run.
>> So i think this information should be included in manifest.xml of the
>> packages.
>> Pozdrawiam
>> Konrad Banachowicz
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users@code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tully Foote
> Systems Engineer
> Willow Garage, Inc.
> tfoote@willowgarage.com
> (650) 475-2827
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users