On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Willy Lambert <lambert.willy@gmail.com> wrote:

I tested the Debian installation. I choosed a desktop-full and everything is OK with the default rosinstall command.

I tried to go further with a "rosmake -a --rosdep-install" And I have some failures during the rosdep phase :
_ nvidia_cg_tookit is a pain since I have to activate the "contrib" apt repository just for it ...
_ opencv 2.3 is not correctly setup in ros/vision_opencv/rosdep.yaml. The problem is that the debian package doesn't have the same name and is not available in this version see : http://packages.debian.org/source/squeeze/opencv. Does this will be ok ? http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/libcv-dev

We're rolling our own opencv debians at this point they come from this sourcedep https://kforge.ros.org/rublee/opencv23debs we can talk about expanding our custom builds from ubuntu to debian. We're using the debian git-buildpackage toolchain.

_ An error that I can't understand :

Failed to find rosdep yaml for package gazebo_worlds on OS:debian version:squeeze
Executing script below with cwd=/tmp
{{{
#!/bin/bash
set -o errexit
dpkg-query -W -f='${Package} ${Status}\n' yaml-cpp-sourcedep 2>&1 | awk '{\
if ($4 =="installed")
exit 0
else
print "yaml-cpp-sourcedep not installed"
exit 1}'

}}}

I think these are seperate. The first is that gazebo_worlds does not have a rosdep rule for yaml in it's search path. This is possibly a typo looking for yaml-cpp. And the seconds is testing if yaml-cpp is installed from the sourcedep yet. The sourcedep is hosted at https://kforge.ros.org/rosrelease/viewvc/sourcedeps/yaml-cpp/

BTW something seems to have change in the rosdep pass, since I have to say Y every time. A shorter option like "-y" would be great instead of --rosdep-yes.

This is because it now supports multiple package managers which requires things to be installed in dependency order, instead of being able to batch them all at once.

I must say anyway that progress since cturtle are huge :)

Glad to hear.

Tully

2011/8/22 Felix Kolbe <Felix.Kolbe@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>

Hello everyone,

I'd like to know who or how many out there are using ROS on Fedora and
especially if anyone got electric running on Fedora [14]?

Unfortunately I got this rosdep issue with beta and rc1:
https://code.ros.org/trac/ros/ticket/3616

Happy coding!
Felix

2011/8/19 Tully Foote <tfoote@willowgarage.com>:

> ROS Electric Release Candidate 1 is now available. Thanks to all of you who
> have participated in the ROS Electic Beta process. We have been able to fix
> numerous issues as well as bring many more stacks into compatibility with
> Electric.
>
> During this release candidate, we ask users of platforms like OS X, Arch,
> Fedora, Gentoo, OpenSUSE, Debian, and Slackware to please verify the ROS
> Electric installation instructions for those platforms.
>
> A super mega thanks for this RC1 goes to:
>
> * Michael Karg, Severin Lemaignan, and Lorenz Mösenlechner: Python 3
> support for major ROS libraries in order to support MORSE
> * William Woodall: OS X integration efforts
> * Thibault Kruset: widespread efforts with rosinstall, roslisp, and
> elsewhere
> * Chris Mansley: rosinstall patches.
>
> This RC1 is limited to robot-generic software. Users of specific robot
> platforms like the PR2 should wait for system integrators to give the
> go-ahead on those platforms.
>
> For a list of updates that ROS Electric provides, please see the ROS
> Electric Beta announcement.
>
> Your Friendly Neighborhood ROS Team
>

> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users@code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users

_______________________________________________
ros-users mailing list
ros-users@code.ros.org
https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users